+1 On Wed, May 11, 2022, 12:00 Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
> I am fine with it: +1 > ________________________________ > Von: Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2022 15:57:54 > An: dev@tomee.apache.org > Betreff: Re: TomEE 9.x - from javax to jakarta namespace > > Alright, with the latest changes pushed yesterday and today, we are now at > the exact same numbers for TomEE 8.x / Jakarta EE 8 under JDK8 and TomEE > 9.x / Jakarta 9.1 under JDK17. > > If everyone is ok with it, we can create a new milestone and give users the > opportunity to provide us with some feedback and to report bugs. > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:06 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Was checking out the TCK numbers this morning can make to suggest a > > 9.0.0-M8 while things look good and found this amazing email. > > > > The 9.0.x branch is looking absolutely amazing!!! > > > > What do we think about pushing out a 9.0.0-M8 while things are in their > > peak-stable state? I'm sure we'll have to rip up a few more things to > > finish off the remaining Jakarta EE and MP TCK issues. Would be great to > > have something that isn't M7 to fallback on as a reference point to track > > regressions. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > On May 10, 2022, at 3:56 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Time for some reporting.... > > > > > > On our journey to migrate TomEE over from javax to jakarta namespace, > we > > > had many issues. > > > After updating all our code, we had to do a bunch of dependency > upgrades > > > after upgrading many of them (OpenWebbeans, BVal, Geronimo, etc). > > > > > > We then faced many issues with non compatible libraries for example > > > (ActiveMQ, commons-dbcp, CXF, sxc, taglib, etc). So we ended up > repacking > > > them in our own groupId after using the Maven Shade plugin to relocate > > the > > > packages. > > > > > > We worked on BVal TCK and CDI TCK and we are close to passing them. > > > > > > But we had before to solve all our outdated MicroProfile 1.3 stack to > the > > > most recent and jakarta compatible version. Geronimo implementations > > being > > > far being, we decided to use some SmallRye implementations until we can > > > dedicate some time to update our Apache implementations (config, > metrics, > > > health, openapi, opentracing, fault tolerance). > > > > > > Our build is now more stable, but still not green. Some issues are > > > basically easy to fix and most people could do it (examples for > > instance). > > > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-full/ > > > > > > The integration for openapi, opentracing and fault tolerance is not > done > > > and we are far from passing the TCK. On config, metrics and health we > are > > > close. Same for our JWT implementation. > > > > > > I also wanted to have a view on the platform TCK, so I decided to stop > > > TomEE work in order to spend time on the Platform TCK to do all > > dependency > > > upgrades and get the TCK to run properly. I'm pleased to announce that > > > after 2 weeks of hard work, we are 99% compatible > > > > > > https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1652104572445 > > > > > > Thanks everyone for the help. > > > Keep going and if you need some guidance or help, let us know. > > > > > > For coordination purposes, here is the issue > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3862 > > > Many subtasks are there and you can create new tasks when needed and > ask > > > any committer to assign it to you. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 11:13 AM Zowalla, Richard < > > > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > > > >> Yes - we already yanked it in 9.x > > >> > > >> Gruß > > >> Richard > > >> > > >> Am Donnerstag, dem 05.05.2022 um 10:10 +0100 schrieb Jonathan > > >> Gallimore: > > >>> Sounds good. I'll drop the transformer from the 8.x branch (looks > > >>> like we > > >>> don't use it in 9.x), and I'll create a single example to demonstrate > > >>> it in > > >>> a sandbox. > > >>> > > >>> Jon > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:32 PM Zowalla, Richard < > > >>> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> You are right - we can remove it imho from 8.x as we do not test > > >>>> with > > >>>> it and the transformed samples might not even work, e.g. > > >>>> dependencies > > >>>> are not migrated, etc. > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 for providing a (bigger) example. > > >>>> > > >>>> Gruß > > >>>> Richard > > >>>> > > >>>> Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:17 +0100 schrieb Jonathan > > >>>> Gallimore: > > >>>>> I've picked up a task related to the examples: > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3873. I specifically > > >>>>> went > > >>>>> for > > >>>>> this, as I added the Eclipse Transformer to the build for a > > >>>>> number of > > >>>>> examples in the past, back when we were doing the transformation > > >>>>> process on > > >>>>> TomEE itself. The drawbacks here is that any tests in the > > >>>>> examples > > >>>>> run on > > >>>>> the javax code, and we just "assume" that the transformed > > >>>>> artifact > > >>>>> works. I > > >>>>> would suggest removing that for the master build, as it just > > >>>>> takes > > >>>>> build > > >>>>> time, and the examples should be transformed from javax to > > >>>>> jakarta at > > >>>>> source (if they aren't already). On the TomEE 8 build, we could > > >>>>> select a > > >>>>> few examples (no need to do them all) and find a way to run the > > >>>>> tests > > >>>>> on > > >>>>> both javax and jakarta versions of TomEE. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Additionally, it would likely be useful to add documentation to > > >>>>> this. > > >>>>> If we > > >>>>> also wanted a bigger example application that specifically covers > > >>>>> transformation, I could look at that too. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> What do you think? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jon > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:58 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > >>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I've been working for quite a long time on TomEE 9.x, and it's > > >>>>>> been > > >>>>>> more > > >>>>>> challenging and painful than I was expecting. I thought it > > >>>>>> would be > > >>>>>> good to > > >>>>>> give you some sort of status. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I created a PR for the work. As a reminder, since Java EE moved > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>> Eclipse > > >>>>>> to become Jakarta EE, we had a switch from javax.* namespace to > > >>>>>> jakarta.* > > >>>>>> namespace. This is an impacting change, since all applications > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>> applications servers are built on top of it. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> In TomEE, we decided to do that change in TomEE. We had > > >>>>>> previously > > >>>>>> a > > >>>>>> bytecode change approach like an application could do. It > > >>>>>> worked > > >>>>>> and we > > >>>>>> were able to get certified. But it had a lot of limitations, so > > >>>>>> we > > >>>>>> had to > > >>>>>> do the migration in the code and fix all compatibility issues. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/814 > > >>>>>> It has 90+ commits and nearly 5000 files touched (added, > > >>>>>> removed, > > >>>>>> updated). > > >>>>>> I understand it's a lot and it makes it almost impossible to > > >>>>>> review. But I > > >>>>>> did not see much approaches in this scenario to create smaller > > >>>>>> PRs. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I created a Jenkins build though available at > > >>>>>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-quick-9.x/ > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> It makes it possible to track the progress. There have been > > >>>>>> steps > > >>>>>> forward > > >>>>>> and steps backward. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> All the code does not sit under TomEE, we use a bunch of third > > >>>>>> party > > >>>>>> projects and libraries. I have been able to contribute, publish > > >>>>>> jakarta > > >>>>>> compatible versions and get releases for some of them (Jakarta > > >>>>>> EE > > >>>>>> APIs Uber > > >>>>>> jar, Geronimo Connectors and Transaction Manager, Geronimo > > >>>>>> Config, > > >>>>>> Health, > > >>>>>> Metrics, OpenTracing, OpenAPI. OpenJPA, BVal, and OpenWebBeans > > >>>>>> will > > >>>>>> be > > >>>>>> released soon. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The big parts is CXF, and ActiveMQ. I had to get them done in > > >>>>>> TomEE > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>> update all group/artifact ids. It's under deps, alongside with > > >>>>>> SXC, > > >>>>>> DBCP, > > >>>>>> and others. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> In terms of removal, I tried to remove old stuff like SAAJ Axis > > >>>>>> 1 > > >>>>>> integration, JAX RPC, Management J2EE and a couple of other old > > >>>>>> things. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> A lot of other libraries got updated to their latest version > > >>>>>> when > > >>>>>> available > > >>>>>> in the new jakarta namespace. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I'm starting to get all the build stable and many modules are > > >>>>>> passing now, > > >>>>>> including all CXF webservices, OpenEJB Core, and others. I can > > >>>>>> get > > >>>>>> a build > > >>>>>> and run TomEE. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Goal is to get a green build asap so we can start working on > > >>>>>> TCK. > > >>>>>> The "quick" build is now green. Working on the full build. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I'll soon be creating a branch for TomEE 8.x maintenance and > > >>>>>> merge > > >>>>>> the PR. > > >>>>>> I'm hoping we can then have small PRs or at least more people > > >>>>>> working in > > >>>>>> parallel. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>>>> > > >> > > > > >
