> On Sep 14, 2022, at 9:26 AM, Zoltán Tichov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unfortunately, I don't fully see the implementation process yet, > because I haven't done it yet. So I would like a few more days if > possible. I have a question though:
The first time is definitely the hardest! > > In the org.apache.tomee.microprofile.opentracing package, can I only > use the classes that you have already made or can I make new ones as > well? Feel free treat the code like it's yours -- make any classes, interfaces, etc that you want. For the me the tricky first step is always making sure I can run the TCK and debug a single test. If you're still figuring that part out, I'll try to write up some of the steps I used in the MP JWT TCK. -David > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:26 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Here we go ... >> >> We are 100% MicroProfile Fault Tolerance compliant ! >> >> @Zlatan did you get somewhere with Open Tracing ? >> Do you need some help ? >> >> David is finishing JWT, so I'll look at the platform TCK failures from >> tomorrow on >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Quick update on my side. >>> >>> The ramp up for Fault Tolerance was a bit longer/harder than expected. >>> >>> SmallRye Fault Tolerance seemed to be passing the entire TCK so started >>> implementing the integration. But ran into issues because the >>> FautlToleranceInterceptor does not seem to be triggered so nothing works. >>> The TCK with timeout etc takes forever. >>> But after some fighting and digging I implemented a workaround because >>> SmallRye Fault Tolerance uses a Weld specific CDI "feature". >>> >>> This is not standard and then of course OpenWebBeans does not do that. >>> I'll create an issue for SmallRye to fix the issue, but meanwhile the >> hack >>> seems to be producing some good effect. We are moving forward. >>> >>> Current status is >>> [ERROR] Tests run: 433, Failures: 49, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 >>> >>> I'll keep going hoping we are 100% compliant by the end of this week. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 8:46 AM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Great news! Thanks, David. >>>> >>>> Am Freitag, dem 09.09.2022 um 20:34 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: >>>>>> On Aug 23, 2022, at 5:39 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> - jwt using TomEE implementation. 22 failures mainly key parsing >>>>>> so not >>>>>> a big deal. David is on it >>>>> >>>>> Down to 2 failures! >>>>> >>>>> As noted in the other thread, I'm tempted to take a quick peek at >>>>> implementing the proposed MP JWT 2.1 requirements and make sure >>>>> everything there is agreeable before the spec goes final. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
