@rzo1 I attempted to change tomee to 11.0-snapshot, i see something like
this, is it good to continue with tomee11 or work with released version of
tomee10?
Caused by: org.apache.xbean.recipe.MissingFactoryMethodException:
Instance factory method is static: public static java.lang.Object
org.apache.openejb.util.PassthroughFactory$Create.create(java.lang.Object)
at
org.apache.xbean.recipe.ReflectionUtil.findInstanceFactory(ReflectionUtil.java:879)
at
org.apache.xbean.recipe.ObjectRecipe.internalCreate(ObjectRecipe.java:299)
at
org.apache.xbean.recipe.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:96)
at
org.apache.xbean.recipe.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:61)
at
org.apache.openejb.InjectionProcessor.construct(InjectionProcessor.java:130)
... 34 more
jakarta.ejb.NoSuchEJBException: Singleton failed to initialize
at
org.apache.openejb.core.singleton.SingletonInstanceManager.createInstance(SingletonInstanceManager.java:210)
Regards
Kartik Sirigeri
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 14:11, kartik sirigeri <[email protected]>
wrote:
> How do I run the full test suite? somethin like this, ./runtests --web
> tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30. ??
> By the way, I ran the test suite with , ./runtests --web tomee-plume -c
> com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.lite.stateful.concurrency.accesstimeout.
> There were some errors due to some sql's, and I had to comment a few
> drop/alter queries. Most of the errors resolved, but a couple of them still
> persist.
> The tests are failing due to the classpath issue mostly i think.
>
> Regards
> Kartik Sirigeri
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 01:28, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Great. Looks like you can now try to run the full ejb suite :)
>>
>> > Am 25.01.2026 um 15:29 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> [email protected]>:
>> >
>> > @rzo1,
>> > that seemed to work,
>> >
>> ===============================================================================
>> >
>> > 1/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest1
>> > - PASSED
>> > 2/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest2
>> > - PASSED
>> > 3/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest3
>> > - PASSED
>> > 4/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest4
>> > - PASSED
>> > 5/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest5
>> > - PASSED
>> > 6/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest1
>> > - PASSED
>> > 7/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest2
>> > - PASSED
>> > 8/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest3
>> > - PASSED
>> > 9/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest4
>> > - PASSED
>> > 10/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest5
>> > - PASSED
>> > 11/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByValueTest
>> > - PASSED
>> > 12/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest1
>> > - PASSED
>> > 13/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest2
>> > - PASSED
>> > 14/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest3
>> > - PASSED
>> > 15/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest4
>> > - PASSED
>> > 16/-0/?0 -
>> >
>> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest5
>> > - PASSED
>> >
>> >
>> ===============================================================================
>> >
>> > Completed running 16 tests (0:00:33.670):
>> >
>> > Passed: 16
>> > Failed: 0
>> > Errors: 0
>> >
>> >
>> ===============================================================================
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Kartik Sirigeri
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 at 13:23, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Yes - it might be required to do some more changes (aside from the
>> update
>> >> on the version of TomEE). Best would be to keep all your changes on a
>> >> branch, so we can PR the ASF repo later.
>> >>
>> >> Regarding the issue: The lib is now called
>> >>
>> >> libre-wsdl4j-1.12.0.jar
>> >>
>> >> I think, that you need to update CommandSupport.groovy#263 to match the
>> >> new pattern.
>> >>
>> >> Gruß
>> >> Richard
>> >>
>> >>> Am 25.01.2026 um 07:36 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> [email protected]
>> >>> :
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi @rzo1, <>
>> >>>
>> >>> I tried running the tck, but it failed. It looks like it is looking up
>> >> for wsdl jars, attached the log for the command ./runtests --web
>> >> tomee-plume com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.localaccess.statelessclient.
>> >>> I had to make a small change in pom.xml to run.
>> >>> changed the below,
>> >>> <openejb.inzip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</openejb.inzip.version>
>> >>> <tomee.inzip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</tomee.inzip.version>
>> >>> <tomee.zip.groupId>org.apache.tomee</tomee.zip.groupId>
>> >>> <tomee.zip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</tomee.zip.version>
>> >>>
>> >>> to,
>> >>> <openejb.inzip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</openejb.inzip.version>
>> >>> <tomee.inzip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</tomee.inzip.version>
>> >>> <tomee.zip.groupId>org.apache.tomee</tomee.zip.groupId>
>> >>> <tomee.zip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</tomee.zip.version>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> <>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> Kartik Sirigeri
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 at 15:59, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think it was renamed to
>> >> https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/blob/tomee-10-with-ee-91/setup.sh
>> >>>> In any case the repo wasn’t touched for a while, so it might need
>> some
>> >> additional love regarding TomEE 10 dependencies / Java version
>> required to
>> >> run.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Gruß
>> >>>> Richard
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Am 24.01.2026 um 05:48 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>> [email protected]>>:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> @rzo1 let me see if i can get the tck run, so i should be using the
>> >>>>> branch tomee-10-with-ee-91 to try out? and i could not see
>> >> setup-tck91.sh
>> >>>>> in the source as mentioned in the readme.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regards
>> >>>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 at 00:04, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks for stepping up.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I think the first step would be to setup the EJB-related parts of
>> >> the TCK
>> >>>>>> located here: https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck
>> >>>>>> As mentioned by David in one of the comments, the most complete
>> part
>> >> would
>> >>>>>> be the EE9.1 TCK since it is already setup.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I think one could try to get it to work with a TomEE 10.1.x first
>> >> and if
>> >>>>>> that works out, we can try to remove the registry so we can
>> directly
>> >> see
>> >>>>>> any sort of regression.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> WDYT? Do you want to give setting up the TCK a try? You are free to
>> >> ask
>> >>>>>> any question on the list - someone with xp in that area will surely
>> >> answer.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Gruß
>> >>>>>> Richard
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Am 23.01.2026 um 07:18 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> >>>>>>> :
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi @dblevins <https://github.com/dblevins> ,
>> >>>>>>> Starting a new thread for ,
>> >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2408.
>> >>>>>>> Let me know how I get started with this. Went through the
>> >>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/p6qht01wjtqfjrywzfkdbk492xkd4ol6
>> ,
>> >>>>>>> understand that this registry should be removed?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>> <log.txt>
>>
>>
