potiuk commented on issue #312: URL: https://github.com/apache/tooling-trusted-releases/issues/312#issuecomment-3533361627
> I think ultimately projects are so heavily invested in RAT already that we'll probably need to make it work, and should ditch the lightweight Python checks. I think it's worth it - and the RAT team would be delighted to hear they are used more and more and that it becomes THE default check for RAT. I am sure @Claudenw would be super happy to hear that - they revamped the whole experience recently with more focus on the CLI to work, and possibly they could even do something else - have a local server" version of RAT - so that you can (on the RAT server) run RAT in a "server" mode and send it archives to verify. Recent version of RAT can automatically decompress and verify the archives. There are still some issues there - not all formats are supported and Airlfow packages for some reason do not work, but this would make it much faster if locally you just pass to rat the archive path, and it could decompress it in memory and do verification there, without having to decompress it locally and send many files somewhere. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
