sbp commented on issue #1214:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/tooling-trusted-releases/issues/1214#issuecomment-4382301871

   @clr-apache I tested by downloading the exact archive files in revision 
[00007](https://release-test.apache.org/revisions/db-jdo/3.3#00007) of your 
`jdo-3.3` draft release, modifying the `.rat-excludes` files as indicated 
earlier in this thread, and then uploading them to my own local instance of 
ATR. The problematic `.gitignore` and `META-INF/services` errors do not appear 
in the checks output, as desired.
   
   Because I could not find modified files in the `jdo-3.3` release (revision 
00007, from 15 Apr 2026, is the latest), I assume that you are running RAT 
checks on modified files locally. Perhaps your invocation of RAT differs from 
the one that ATR uses? You can see the exact command used in the check by 
opening the check dropdown on e.g. the 
[`jdo-3.3-SNAPSHOT-source-release.tar.gz` check results 
page](https://release-test.apache.org/report/db-jdo/3.3/jdo-3.3-SNAPSHOT-source-release.tar.gz).
 If you scroll down to `Rat Check` and open the `details` element, then scroll 
down to `Command`, you'll see the command. Note that ATR has to explicitly pass 
`.rat-excludes` to RAT, as RAT does not automatically scan for or use this file.
   
   If you upload the files to ATR, I will be able to see what ATR makes of them 
and understand what's going wrong if there are still problems. Otherwise, if 
you do not want to upload them to ATR for any reason, I would appreciate 
knowing more about how you invoked RAT to help you to debug this.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to