Hi,
FYI, Vladimir created the CWS "winordinals" on the DEV300 codeline to
modify the Windows builds to export symbols instead of ordinals.
Regards,
Jörg
Vladimir Glazounov schrieb:
Hi,
the installed office with ordinals: 339MB (349MB on disk), with symbols
- 356 MB (365 MB on disk). So, +5%...
Vladimir
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi,
Vladimir was speeking about an increase of 3M of the install set due
to exported sysmbol, how much will this be once the Office got
installed ?
Martin
Jörg Jahnke wrote:
Hi,
to elaborate a bit more: There were concerns that using symbols
instead of ordinals might lead to a significant performance loss
during startup. Vladimir's performance measurements (see
https://tools.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.Attachment?cmd=read&Id=6381&Filename=performancetest%20[%2018.%20Feb%202008,%2013:35%20(Windows%20XP)%20])
indicate that we would lose less than 2% speed on startup. IMO this
is acceptable and we should thus get rid of building with ordinals.
Any objections?
Regards,
Jörg
Vladimir Glazounov schrieb:
Hi all,
because I investigated the case, I blogged about the theme here:
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/linking_office_libraries_for_win32
All comments are welcome.
Vladimir
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi,
I just found at
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOo30_release_engineering_planned_changes
that we plan to change the "export by ordinal" for windows. What is
planned for OOo 3.0 ? Export by name or by alias ? Can you
elaborate on this ? Is there an Issue or other documentation
available ?
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
