Trying to read through phone, but I noticed that it is implemented in C. We're using JeroMQ to avoid depending on a binary and JNI. If they don't have a Java API, I'd say no.
Don't know if it is compatible with ZeroMQ, which we need to maintain support for Jupyter. Would need to take a deeper look. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016, 12:16 PM Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > Is nanomsg a viable alternative? > > http://nanomsg.org/ > http://nanomsg.org/documentation.html > http://nanomsg.org/documentation-zeromq.html > > - Sam Ruby > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not certain where to best ask this question. Please let me know > > if it would be better addressed elsewhere. > > > > At the Apache Software Foundation we have an incubating project (named > > Toree[1]) that has a dependency on Zeromq. LGPL is problematic for > > us[2], probably for the same reasons that you are considering moving > > to MPL[3]. > > > > What is the status and plans of your move to MPLv2? > > > > - Sam Ruby > > > > [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ToriiProposal > > [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > [3] http://zeromq.org/area:licensing >
