@Sam Our need for ZeroMQ is due to Jupyter. Jupyter relies on ZeroMQ for communication between the Client and Server. In Toree's case, one of it's roles is as the Server to a Jupyter Notebook. We don't want to loose this usecase.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > Is nanomsg a viable alternative? > > http://nanomsg.org/ > http://nanomsg.org/documentation.html > http://nanomsg.org/documentation-zeromq.html > > - Sam Ruby > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not certain where to best ask this question. Please let me know > > if it would be better addressed elsewhere. > > > > At the Apache Software Foundation we have an incubating project (named > > Toree[1]) that has a dependency on Zeromq. LGPL is problematic for > > us[2], probably for the same reasons that you are considering moving > > to MPL[3]. > > > > What is the status and plans of your move to MPLv2? > > > > - Sam Ruby > > > > [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ToriiProposal > > [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > [3] http://zeromq.org/area:licensing >
