I'd also love to ditch the RPMs, but I'll abstain from voting since it directly impacts me immediately (less work for me!).
Would anyone else like to weigh in on this? Dan On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basic-facts >> >> Missing checksums for the artifacts. >> >> And for the record, I am still not liking the RPM's as release artifacts, >> but I'll let the IPMC weigh in on that. > > > If I had a vote, now that you have the tar-ball, I’d ditch all he RPMs. If > someone needs the RPMs, make a Makefile target such that someone can produce > those source RPMs (shouldn’t they be .srpm) from the tar-ball. > > Cheers, > > — Leif >
