+1 here as well..

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I am all for one less tool to use. Also I think it will lower bar to bringing 
> more people into our project if they don’t have to sign up for the ASF JIRA 
> separately.
>
> —Eric
>
>> On May 17, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Mark Torluemke <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Also +1. Part of the move from github.com/Comcast to ASF JIRA included a
>> 'scrub', so the move to github.com/apache can likely be scripted.
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Robert Butts <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> IMO Github issues, wiki, etc are much, much easier to use than Atlassian
>>> tools.
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Dave Neuman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> While at ApaceCon, a few of us attended a talk about navigating the
>>>> incubator where we were informed that "full" Github is now available for
>>>> podlings.  This gives us the ability to use github issues, to use github
>>>> wiki, to assign PRs, to add tags to PRs, and the "merge PR" button among
>>>> other things.  It sounds like the process would take our repo down for a
>>>> short period - minutes not hours - but the URL shouldn't change.  I know
>>> we
>>>> just got all of our issues moved to Jira, but we would need to move them
>>>> over to github as well.
>>>>
>>>> Since the apache way is to have a discussion before a vote, I thought I
>>>> would start the discussion on this topic now and if we feel like this is
>>>> worth pursuing, we start a vote.  So....thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to