+1
> On May 17, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Jan van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:59 AM Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 here as well.. >> >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I am all for one less tool to use. Also I think it will lower bar to >> bringing more people into our project if they don’t have to sign up for the >> ASF JIRA separately. >>> >>> —Eric >>> >>>> On May 17, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Mark Torluemke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Also +1. Part of the move from github.com/Comcast to ASF JIRA included >> a >>>> 'scrub', so the move to github.com/apache can likely be scripted. >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Robert Butts <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> IMO Github issues, wiki, etc are much, much easier to use than >> Atlassian >>>>> tools. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Dave Neuman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> While at ApaceCon, a few of us attended a talk about navigating the >>>>>> incubator where we were informed that "full" Github is now available >> for >>>>>> podlings. This gives us the ability to use github issues, to use >> github >>>>>> wiki, to assign PRs, to add tags to PRs, and the "merge PR" button >> among >>>>>> other things. It sounds like the process would take our repo down >> for a >>>>>> short period - minutes not hours - but the URL shouldn't change. I >> know >>>>> we >>>>>> just got all of our issues moved to Jira, but we would need to move >> them >>>>>> over to github as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since the apache way is to have a discussion before a vote, I thought >> I >>>>>> would start the discussion on this topic now and if we feel like this >> is >>>>>> worth pursuing, we start a vote. So....thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Dave >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>
