Any takers for 2.1 release manager? Dan and I will both make ourselves available to help out and the process is pretty well known at this point.
—Eric > On Jul 6, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]> wrote: > > fwiw, 1.8.0 was lengthy because of the transition to Apache Incubator > -- we had a lot of work there. And 2.0.0 was as well because of the > transition to postgres from mysql. 2.1.0 is expected to be > significantly less trouble, and Eric and I have paved the way to > make it so. We'll be available to assist whomever takes on the role > of release manager. > > -dan > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Dave Neuman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey All, >> Now that 2.0 has officially passed the project and IPMC vote (YAY!), it's >> time to start thinking about 2.1. I don't think we have identified a >> release manager for the 2.1 release yet, would anyone like to volunteer? >> >> Thanks, >> Dave
