That would be great, particularly for a big change like this (of course
it would be nice
to have it automatic and continuous....).
I'll build a tracking git branch and post a URL.
john
On 12/9/2009 8:24 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 12/09/2009 05:15 PM, John Plevyak wrote:
I would like to ask for a vote on whether or not to commit the cache
partition size patch (+1, -1, 0).
Background:
Before I vote, I guess the concern that will come up is how stable
this is? How can we verify that the new cache layout is at least as
stable as the old one? We just got access to a pretty serious proxy /
cache tool, it'd be interesting to running it against a build with and
without this patch, and see if that discovers any anomalies (it might
detect other bugs though in the code :).
-- Leif
