On 12/09/2009 10:02 PM, John Plevyak wrote:
That would be great, particularly for a big change like this (of
course it would be nice
to have it automatic and continuous....).
I'll build a tracking git branch and post a URL.
Ok, cool. So, I'll vote a +1 on having this in the 2.0 release, for two
reasons:
1) The sooner we get it in, the more testing we get done. And the less
impact we have on people using it if we delay the merge until later release.
2) It's good stuff.
My +1 is contingent on this being reviewed by someone familiar with the
cache code (maybe VJ or Steve), and a review from Bryan.
Please, everyone, make sure you voice your concerns (pros/cons etc.),
and cast your votes. IMO, we should do the normal ASF voting process
here, so in 72 hours from the initial request for vote, John should call
it. The patch has been available for review for quite some time now.
Cheers,
-- Leif
