> On Apr 2, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Apr 2, 2015, at 9:51 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 1, 2015, at 6:08 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 1, 2015, at 3:50 PM, zw...@apache.org wrote:
>>>> 
>>> [snip]
>>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/blob/26f438d4/proxy/http2/Http2SessionAccept.cc
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> diff --git a/proxy/http2/Http2SessionAccept.cc 
>>>> b/proxy/http2/Http2SessionAccept.cc
>>>> index 5fe2ce7..fbb25db 100644
>>>> --- a/proxy/http2/Http2SessionAccept.cc
>>>> +++ b/proxy/http2/Http2SessionAccept.cc
>>>> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Http2SessionAccept::accept(NetVConnection *netvc, 
>>>> MIOBuffer *iobuf, IOBufferRead
>>>> {
>>>> // XXX we need to refactor the ACL checks from HttpSessionAccept so that 
>>>> we can invoke them here, and also in
>>>> // the SPDY protocol layer ...
>>>> -  Warning("skipping access control checks for HTTP/2 connection");
>>>> +  // Warning("skipping access control checks for HTTP/2 connection");
>>> 
>>> I added this warning so that someone would wire up the access control 
>>> checks for HTTP/2. I don't think we should remove the warning without doing 
>>> that :)
>> 
>> 
>> I disagree, the Warning() makes the entire HTTP2 feature useless since it’ll 
>> fill up the disk :/.

yeh filling up the disk is bad

>> Feel free to make it a single warning on startup maybe ?
> 
> 
> I filed a Jira though, since there was none.

thanks .. and thanks for the other patch ;)

J

Reply via email to