One thing I've encountered on GitHub is that you can only assign a PR review to a member of the `apache` organization. Is that also true for issues?
Kenn On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:36 PM Sönke Liebau <[email protected]> wrote: > Heyho, > > in the case of jira vs github issues I am in favor of jira. > Github issues just feel .. "off" to me somehow as well as simply having > less functionality. > > Best regards, > Sönke > > > Am Sa., 23. Feb. 2019, 00:14 hat Justin Mclean <[email protected]> > geschrieben: > > > Hi, > > > > > Out of curiosity: Can you point at one or two? I assume it's mostly the > > > newer ones. > > > > Yes mostly newer podlings but then that’s what I mostly work with for > > instance [1] (9,500+ issues), but there’s at least one TLP I also know > that > > uses it. [2] > > > > This is not to say these projects are exemplar in any way or we should > > copy what they do. :-) > > > > > Not really. There's one thread that comes to mind[1] > > > > Yep it would seem that GitHub issues may be a bit of a grey area here. > > > > BTW I'm fine with JIRA but if people want to use GitHub issues I’m also > > fine with that. I guess it come down to what is our audience most likely > > to want to use, being more the technical trainer types they may be > familiar > > with a GitHub workflow rather than a JIRA one? But I’m not really sure. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-echarts/issues > > 2. https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues > > > > >
