Hey everybody,

I want to follow up on Justin's email with thoughts regarding "content
on-boarding".

What do you think about a specific on-boarding workflow like this:

(1) Content location (typically an URL) is provided (public git repo,
webserver, Slideshare, etc. )
(2) Contributor fills out a content registration form, which contains
Justin's questions and others.
(3) Apache-Training community is informed via Email and verification of
content / licenses is done
(4) Apache-Training community votes for onboarding or rejects
(5.a) accepted content is stored in the Apache-Training content stage and
community is notified, JIRA-xyz: transform and index content
(5.b) rejected proposal is stored in the Apache-Training content stage and
submitters is notified
(6) content item is in state: accepted
(7) after JIRA-xyz has been processed, using the previously JIRA workflow,
the content is "ready for release"



TBD:
- how to package multiple content items in one release
- finalize the onboarding checklist (proposal be Justin)
- provide a list of compatible licenses
- describe the "process of relicensing"
- describe a "cleanup process" to reduce "incompatible content"




*Initial set of question for checklist:*- Who created the content?
- In case of multiple authors: Did all give permission for this to be
licensed under it’s license?
- Some potential IP/license issues:
- Where did the following come from and how are they licensed?
  - The content itself
  - Slide theme, fonts and illustrations
  - Icons used in the slides
- Are recordings of the slides being presented?



Best wishes,
Mirko





Am Do., 21. März 2019 um 02:24 Uhr schrieb Justin Mclean <
[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> > I also have a slide deck on 'The Apache Way'
> > https://s.apache.org/apache-way-for-everyone
>
> Great content and would be good to have it here so it can be used and
> updated by all.
>
> For it to be used here I have some questions.
> - Is google docs the right format?
> - Who created the content? Did all give permission for this to be licensed
> under it’s license?
> - Some potential IP/license issues. Where did the following come  from and
> how are they licensed?
>   - The content itself (seems to be CC-BY)
>   - Slide theme
>   - Icons used in the slides
> - Do you have any recordings of the slides being presented?
>
> It’s seem to be currently licensed under:
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
>
> Which probably means we cannot us it [1] unless it was re-licensed, even
> if it changed to CC-SA there are issues [2].
>
>  I’m more thinking out-loud here and perhaps some of the above could
> become a check list for incoming content?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-by
> 2. https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa



-- 

Dr. rer. nat. Mirko Kämpf
Müchelner Str. 23
06259 Frankleben

Reply via email to