Those are great questions Justin, my answers are in line:

- Is google docs the right format?

I used google docs because personally for me it is easy to work with. But I
can change the format to anything the community agrees on.

- Who created the content? Did all give permission for this to be licensed
> under it’s license?

I created the content based on the information provided in various parts of
apache.org and gave the references where appropriate. Is there anything i
need to do?

- Some potential IP/license issues. Where did the following come  from and
> how are they licensed?
>   - The content itself (seems to be CC-BY)
>
I really wasn't sure which license to use, as I thought Apache and MIT
licenses refer mostly to the code. (eg, it has patent grant, and that is
not really applicable to the slide?). Also i looked to other slides in
apache.org to see how they are licensed but i couldn't find relevant
information.


>   - Slide theme
>
Diagrams used were designed from scratch by Amardip Raol and I have his
permission to use. The theme I believe is good too.

>   - Icons used in the slides
>
I have originally used couple from flaticon, but changed them to google
material design icons <https://github.com/google/material-design-icons> that
have Apache license. Should that be good?

> - Do you have any recordings of the slides being presented?
>
No

>
> It’s seem to be currently licensed under:
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
>
> Which probably means we cannot us it [1] unless it was re-licensed, even
> if it changed to CC-SA there are issues [2].
>
I am happy to relicense it.  I used CC-BY because I believed it was the
most permissive out of all CC licenses, and I wasn't sure whether Apache
license was appropriate for this kind of content.

>
>  I’m more thinking out-loud here and perhaps some of the above could
> become a check list for incoming content?
>
+1. Also +1 on Mirko's points, especially on:
- provide a list of compatible licenses
- describe the "process of relicensing"
- describe a "cleanup process" to reduce "incompatible content"

Thanks,
Aizhamal

Reply via email to