Hi, > I believe it to be just normal that things take a while to establish > themselves.
I first made that pull request 2 weeks ago, that seems a long time to get something into a repo. But then again all ASF projects I work on use CTR, where any committer can commit right away, and others can review when they need and/or when coming up to a release, rather than the process here. I’m sort of a little confused to why we need to have two people(?) need to approve a PR before it get submitted, IMO that stops people being able to work effectively on it and collaborate and seems to just prolong the process. This process also seem to enforce use of the GitHub UI which if at all possible I’d rather avoid. I go along with it if I must but I really not sure what advantage it gives over having a discussion here on the mailing list. It seems to fragment the discussion and people not following along on GitHub may be missing context. I appreciated the feedback given on the PRs but so far it seems that the PR needs to be of a very high standard before it can be committed. My concern is that may be an artificial barrier to entry, especially when starting out. IMO It good to have a few things not 100% polished in your repo as that give people work to do if they are inclined. Thanks, Justin
