sounds good!
 +1
Goson zhang <[email protected]> 于2020年12月8日周二 上午10:30写道:

> Yesterday there was a business consultation, how reliable is the TubeMQ
> system?
>
> I understand that the system reliability is divided into two parts, one is
> the reliability of the system services, and the other is the data
> reliability:
>
> System reliability:
> 1.1 As long as any one of the Brokers survive allocated by the topic in the
> cluster, the production and consumption services of the topic are
> available;
> 1.2 Based on point 1.1, as long as all topics in the cluster have any
> Broker alive, the topic of the entire cluster is available for production
> and consumption services;
> 1.3 Even if the control node Masters all hangs up, the new production and
> consumption in the cluster will be affected, but the registered production
> and consumption will not stop production and consumption;
>
> Data reliability:
> In the TubeMQ system, data is stored in a single-node disk RAID10 copy
> mode, data may be lost only under the following conditions:
> 2.1 When the machine is powered off, the data that has been successfully
> replied but not consumed yet and is in the memory will be lost; after the
> machine is online, the stored data will not be affected;
> 2.2 Disk abnormalities that cannot be held by RAID10 hold, data that has
> returned successfully but not yet consumed will be affected; after the disk
> is repaired, data that has been stored but not recovered will be affected
> 2.3 Daily bad disks, the production and consumption of broken disk Broker
> nodes will not be affected.
>
> Related quantitative reliability indicators, I personally feel that it is
> not easy to evaluate, it is related to the hardware situation and the IDC
> environment, but there is an application situation for reference: according
> to the statistics in our environment in 2019, the entire TubeMQ cluster
> 1500 machines are about 40 in the whole year which ping abnormalities and
> abnormal disk group damage that cannot be held by RAID10. At the same time,
> the machines we use are second-hand machines and equipment that have been
> eliminated after several years of business use.
>
> Thanks
>

Reply via email to