Hi Thomas,

only laziness kept me from doing/addressing this properly. 

Thanks, Thomas, I agree. 

The last battlefield would be commons, avalon almost done (both in Turbine 
and Fulcrum) and slf4j already removed (for the latter log4j2 provides all 
integrations: l->s, s->l).

But should we change all implementations (removing commons.logging) or use 
the Commons Logging Bridge or both? ;-)

Best regards,

Georg



Von:    Thomas Vandahl <[email protected]>
An:     Turbine Developers List <[email protected]>
Datum:  28.02.2019 20:20
Betreff:        Log4j2?



Hi folks,

I'm totally aware that this is a delicate matter and friendships have
been destroyed over this question. But anyway: Shall we switch to Log4j2
as our primary log library?

GD&R
Bye, Thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to