Hello Jean-Sebastien, Thank you very much for the clarification. I wasn't very much clear about the difference. I am happy to continue with the first proposal.
Charuka On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charuka Jayarathna wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The presentation + demo at JavaOne 2008, Jos and Tijs have done the >> same scenario which Jean-Sebastien explains. presentation can be used >> well on implementing a similar scenario and get a better feeling on >> integration, which I am doing now. > > Hmmm, what they've done is different from what I was proposing, there are at > least three main differences: > > - IIRC they are running Tuscany as a Service Engine inside a JBI server, I > was proposing something different: translate SCA definitions to JBI > configuration for a JBI server, without requiring the Tuscany runtime. > > - I think they use SCA wires to represent communication between Service > Engines (as they had an instance of Tuscany and an SCA domain per Service > Engine). They use a special JBI binding, which I'm not sure is really > needed. > > - They created one SCA domain per JBI Service Engine. IMO an SCA Domain is a > domain of administration so instead I'd imagine 1 SCA Domain -> n Multiple > Servers -> containing m Service Engines with the SCA domain being used to > manage a network of connected of JBI and other servers. > > What they've done is a good first step to explore the integration > capabilities though, and it would be great to have them push this further. > > But I think, what Tuscany requires >> >> is an integration of the type what Jean-Sebestian suggest in (b). >> Please advice me on that. >> >>>> b) implement the minimum subset of the JBI SPIs enabling ServiceMix >>>> Binding >>>> Components and Service Engines to be reused and plugged into Tuscany > > OK, I'll try to give more thoughts on that if this is what you're most > interested in, probably later today, but note one thing though: (b) is not > really about integrating JBI and SCA, it is just a cheap way to reuse in > Tuscany pieces of middleware (binding code) implemented in another > open-source project (which just happens to be a JBI project). > >> >> Thanks >> >> Charuka >> >>>> but the SCA on top of JBI story I've described above is more interesting >>>> IMO. >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Relationship+of+SCA+and+JBI >>>> >>>> Hope this helps. >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Sebastien >>>> > > > -- > Jean-Sebastien >
