Hi Erwan, THanks for the document.
Charuka On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Erwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > You may also take a look to the following document which deals with SCAHi > integration in PETALS ESB (JBI) Compliant. > Approach seems to be SCA as a JBI Service Engine. > > http://www.ow2.org/xwiki/bin/download/Events/OW2QuarterlyMeetingGrenobleFrance/SCAwithPEtALS_05_15_2008.pdf > > Hope mailling MessageId will work since I suscribed/get the message/replied > in order to follow the thread > > Regards, > Erwan > > Raymond Feng a écrit : >> >> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">Hi, >> >> The following JavaOne session may give you a good idea to start. I believe >> the two presenters have done some work. It would be nice to see them come >> aboard to join the efforts. >> >> http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/2008/pdf/TS-5870.pdf >> >> Here is a summary of the analogy of the concepts between SCA and JBI. >> >> SCA JBI >> ----------------------- ------------------------------ >> Implementation SE (Service Engine) >> Binding BC (Binding Component) >> Composite SA (Service Assembly) >> Component SU (Service Unit) >> Service SU Provides >> Reference SU Consumes >> Wire Connection >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Charuka Jayarathna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:24 PM >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: writing binding extension to integrate JBI BC >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to integrate JBI with Tuscany. I followed Apache >>> implementation of JBI , "servicemix" to get familiar with a JBI >>> implementation. I would like to clarify following before proceeding >>> any further. I appreciate your guide and thoughts. Please correct me >>> if I am not going the correct direction. >>> >>> In the proposal, you suggest to write a tuscany binding extension to >>> run a JBI binding component. Does that mean to transfer any specific >>> binding type defined according to JBI standard to one protocol type so >>> that tuscany runtime could handle the binding type?. >>> >>> thank you >>> charuka >> >> </div> >> >
