On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:48 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes trunk is now on version 3-SNAPSHOT but the 1.3 branch is still on >> 2-incubating isn't it? We'd need to do an official release of the new one to >> use it with the 1.3 release so I'd vote for just dropping the parent pom >> now. >> >> ...ant >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:06 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > Now Tuscany is a TLP. We have to make a few changes in the parent pom >>>> [1], >>>> > such as: >>>> > >>>> > 1) Remove incubating from the version numbers (including the >>>> java/pom.xml >>>> > [2]). >>>> > 2) Change <distributionManagement> section so that >>>> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ will be >>>> used >>>> > for mvn:deploy. >>>> > 3) Change the<url> for tuscany to use http://tuscany.apache.org. (I >>>> did >>>> > these already). >>>> > >>>> > I think we should do the above for 1.3 release branch too. Please feel >>>> free >>>> > to add anything that I might have missed. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Raymond >>>> > >>>> > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/pom/parent/pom.xml >>>> > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/pom.xml >>>> > >>>> >>>> Whats the status of this? I might be coming in a little late but how >>>> about >>>> just dropping the tuscany parent pom altogether? We discussed this >>>> recently >>>> and have done it for the SDO 1.1.1 release - >>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/dq2btsacsawfznop >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>> >>> The 1.3 branch now uses the new parent pom as does the trunk I believe. >>> >>> I've no objection to moving away from the parent pom but I think we >>> should come to some conclusions about our distribution story first just in >>> case we need it. >>> >>> Simon >>> >> >> > I have the 1.3 pom change sitting on my disc waiting to go. > > I though I had started a VOTE on this last week but of course that mail > when the way of most of the things I sent toward the end of last week. > > So, if you're happy to make the pom changes, I 'll go along with removing > it and worry about our distribution story separately. > > Simon > I'm not sure what you mean by "worry about our distribution story separately", is there something more to this that I'm missing? ...ant
