I have made a small update under revision #673818 to allow maven to find the sdo 1.1 plugins.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:39 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I made this change in trunk yesterday in r673459, will merge it to the 1.3 > branch today if no problems are reported with the change in trunk. > > ...ant > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:48 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Yes trunk is now on version 3-SNAPSHOT but the 1.3 branch is still on >>> 2-incubating isn't it? We'd need to do an official release of the new one to >>> use it with the 1.3 release so I'd vote for just dropping the parent pom >>> now. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:06 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > Now Tuscany is a TLP. We have to make a few changes in the parent pom >>>>> > [1], >>>>> > such as: >>>>> > >>>>> > 1) Remove incubating from the version numbers (including the >>>>> > java/pom.xml >>>>> > [2]). >>>>> > 2) Change <distributionManagement> section so that >>>>> > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ will be >>>>> > used >>>>> > for mvn:deploy. >>>>> > 3) Change the<url> for tuscany to use http://tuscany.apache.org. (I >>>>> > did >>>>> > these already). >>>>> > >>>>> > I think we should do the above for 1.3 release branch too. Please >>>>> > feel free >>>>> > to add anything that I might have missed. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > Raymond >>>>> > >>>>> > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/pom/parent/pom.xml >>>>> > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/pom.xml >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Whats the status of this? I might be coming in a little late but how >>>>> about >>>>> just dropping the tuscany parent pom altogether? We discussed this >>>>> recently >>>>> and have done it for the SDO 1.1.1 release - >>>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/dq2btsacsawfznop >>>>> >>>>> ...ant >>>> >>>> The 1.3 branch now uses the new parent pom as does the trunk I believe. >>>> >>>> I've no objection to moving away from the parent pom but I think we >>>> should come to some conclusions about our distribution story first just in >>>> case we need it. >>>> >>>> Simon >>> >> >> I have the 1.3 pom change sitting on my disc waiting to go. >> >> I though I had started a VOTE on this last week but of course that mail >> when the way of most of the things I sent toward the end of last week. >> >> So, if you're happy to make the pom changes, I 'll go along with removing >> it and worry about our distribution story separately. >> >> Simon > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
