Big +1 from me, i'd probably prefer the messages go to the commit list but
either would be an improvement.

   ...ant

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> I have recently changed the Tuscany continuum build schedules to once
> a day instead of multiple times as it was originally set, and there
> was also some changes on the build error notification e-mails, that
> now contains only a summary of the errors and a link to the full log
> as on the notification example below.
>
> I was wondering that if we should get the build notifications back to
> the dev-list, as this would help us to get and continue with a stable
> trunk/build.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:18 AM
> Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA
> Implementation Project - Build Def:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Online report :
>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=99875&projectId=277
>
> Build statistics:
>  State: Failed
>  Previous State: Failed
>  Started at: Thu 3 Jul 2008 03:15:26 -0700
>  Finished at: Thu 3 Jul 2008 03:17:35 -0700
>  Total time: 2m 9s
>  Build Trigger: Schedule
>  Build Number: 195
>  Exit code: 1
>  Building machine hostname: vmbuild.apache.org
>  Operating system : Linux(unknown)
>  Java Home version :         java version "1.5.0_12"
>        Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> 1.5.0_12-b04)
>        Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode, sharing)
>       Builder version :
>        Maven version: 2.0.8
>        Java version: 1.5.0_12
>        OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.20-16-server" arch: "i386" Family:
> "unix"
>
>  ****************************************************************************
> SCM Changes:
>
> ****************************************************************************
> No files changed
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Dependencies Changes:
>
> ****************************************************************************
> No dependencies changed
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Build Defintion:
>
> ****************************************************************************
> POM filename: pom.xml
> Goals: -Pdistribution clean install   Arguments: --batch-mode
> Build Fresh: true
> Always Build: false
> Default Build Definition: true
> Schedule: DEFAULT_SCHEDULE
> Profile Name: Java 5, Large Memory
> Description:
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Test Summary:
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Tests: 108
> Failures: 1
> Total time: 8.749001
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Test Failures:
>
> ****************************************************************************
>
> DefaultCorbaHostTestCase
>  test_registerServant :
>  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null
>       at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:53)
>       at
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.corba.testing.DefaultCorbaHostTestCase.test_registerServant(DefaultCorbaHostTestCase.java:94)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.executeMethodBody(TestMethodRunner.java:99)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runUnprotected(TestMethodRunner.java:81)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(BeforeAndAfterRunner.java:34)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runMethod(TestMethodRunner.java:75)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.run(TestMethodRunner.java:45)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.invokeTestMethod(TestClassMethodsRunner.java:75)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.run(TestClassMethodsRunner.java:36)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner$1.runUnprotected(TestClassRunner.java:42)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(BeforeAndAfterRunner.java:34)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner.run(TestClassRunner.java:52)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:138)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:125)
>       at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:132)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:308)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:879)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to