On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote: > >> Big +1 from me, i'd probably prefer the messages go to the commit list but >> either would be an improvement. >> >> We have clear evidence from the last few weeks that without these > timely public reminders of the status of the build, the trunk is in > a broken state far more often than it can be built cleanly. Looking > back at the continuum history, there have been no successful SCA Java > builds since the start of recorded history on May 7, 2008. So +++1 > for restoring these notifications to the ML. > > I think these notifications are useful to people other than the > committers, so I would prefer to have them on the dev list. > > Simon > > ...ant >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> I have recently changed the Tuscany continuum build schedules to once >> a day instead of multiple times as it was originally set, and there >> was also some changes on the build error notification e-mails, that >> now contains only a summary of the errors and a link to the full log >> as on the notification example below. >> >> I was wondering that if we should get the build notifications back to >> the dev-list, as this would help us to get and continue with a stable >> trunk/build. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:18 AM >> Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Tuscany - Apache Tuscany SCA >> Implementation Project - Build Def: >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Online report : >> >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=99875&projectId=277 >> < >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=99875&projectId=277 >> > >> >> Build statistics: >> State: Failed >> Previous State: Failed >> Started at: Thu 3 Jul 2008 03:15:26 -0700 >> Finished at: Thu 3 Jul 2008 03:17:35 -0700 >> Total time: 2m 9s >> Build Trigger: Schedule >> Build Number: 195 >> Exit code: 1 >> Building machine hostname: vmbuild.apache.org >> <http://vmbuild.apache.org> >> >> Operating system : Linux(unknown) >> Java Home version : java version "1.5.0_12" >> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build >> 1.5.0_12-b04) >> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode, >> sharing) >> Builder version : >> Maven version: 2.0.8 >> Java version: 1.5.0_12 >> OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.20-16-server" arch: "i386" >> Family: "unix" >> >> **************************************************************************** >> SCM Changes: >> >> **************************************************************************** >> No files changed >> >> >> **************************************************************************** >> Dependencies Changes: >> >> **************************************************************************** >> No dependencies changed >> >> >> >> **************************************************************************** >> Build Defintion: >> >> **************************************************************************** >> POM filename: pom.xml >> Goals: -Pdistribution clean install Arguments: --batch-mode >> Build Fresh: true >> Always Build: false >> Default Build Definition: true >> Schedule: DEFAULT_SCHEDULE >> Profile Name: Java 5, Large Memory >> Description: >> >> **************************************************************************** >> Test Summary: >> >> **************************************************************************** >> Tests: 108 >> Failures: 1 >> Total time: 8.749001 >> >> >> **************************************************************************** >> Test Failures: >> >> **************************************************************************** >> >> DefaultCorbaHostTestCase >> test_registerServant : >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null >> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) >> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:53) >> at >> >> >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.corba.testing.DefaultCorbaHostTestCase.test_registerServant(DefaultCorbaHostTestCase.java:94) >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >> at >> >> >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) >> at >> >> >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.executeMethodBody(TestMethodRunner.java:99) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runUnprotected(TestMethodRunner.java:81) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(BeforeAndAfterRunner.java:34) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.runMethod(TestMethodRunner.java:75) >> at >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethodRunner.run(TestMethodRunner.java:45) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.invokeTestMethod(TestClassMethodsRunner.java:75) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassMethodsRunner.run(TestClassMethodsRunner.java:36) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner$1.runUnprotected(TestClassRunner.java:42) >> at >> >> >> org.junit.internal.runners.BeforeAndAfterRunner.runProtected(BeforeAndAfterRunner.java:34) >> at >> org.junit.internal.runners.TestClassRunner.run(TestClassRunner.java:52) >> at >> >> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62) >> at >> >> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:138) >> at >> >> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:125) >> at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:132) >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >> at >> >> >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) >> at >> >> >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) >> at >> >> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:308) >> at >> >> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:879) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> Apache Tuscany Committer >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> > +1 from me. We're working in the dark a little without them. Simon
