Hi Guys, Thanks to everyone for your time on TUSCANY-2531, given the fact this is an axis bug then I concur and will switch my vote to +1 :)
Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:22 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved >>> the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability >>> for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it >>> can be executed on java 1.4 clients. >>> >>> Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dave. >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > ++Vamsi >>> > >>> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are >>> >> now >>> >> available, please review and vote to release. >>> >> >>> >> The artifacts are available for at: >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/ >>> >> >>> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven >>> >> staging >>> >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports. >>> >> >>> >> The SVN tag for the release is: >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1 >>> >> >>> >> +1 to release from me. >>> >> >>> >> ...ant >>> > >>> > >> >> I looks like Simon has run >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2531 to ground to the extent >> it looks like we are generating WSDL in accordance with the JAXB spec but >> that several WSDL2Java tools are not able to cope with this. So for an >> actual fix we are a bit stuck at the moment. He has suggested a work around >> which involves adding JAXB annotations to Java classes to force a namespace >> to appear. Dave, is this practical for you for the time being? >> >> As for the Geronimo issue (http://markmail.org/message/xb4m72afvn5xg67e) >> can someone comment if this is being worked on? From the mails it looks like >> either a Geronimo problem or a spec problem. Either of these will take some >> time to fix. Do people think we can hold this over and do a 1.3.2? We have >> been waiting a while to get 1.3.1 out and nobody has actually asked for the >> Geronimo fix. >> >> Simon > > If Dave can live with the TUSCANY-2531 work around for now then I agree we > should get 1.3.1 out and leave any other issues for the next release. Note > for that to happen we still need another PMC +1 vote on 1.3.1, any other > PMCers care to vote pending Dave's reply? > > ...ant >
