Looks good to me, +1. On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Thanks to everyone for your time on TUSCANY-2531, given the fact this > is an axis bug then I concur and will switch my vote to +1 :) > > Cheers, > > Dave. > > -- > Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:22 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved >>>> the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability >>>> for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it >>>> can be executed on java 1.4 clients. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Dave. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> > +1 >>>> > >>>> > ++Vamsi >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are >>>> >> now >>>> >> available, please review and vote to release. >>>> >> >>>> >> The artifacts are available for at: >>>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/ >>>> >> >>>> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven >>>> >> staging >>>> >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports. >>>> >> >>>> >> The SVN tag for the release is: >>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1 >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 to release from me. >>>> >> >>>> >> ...ant >>>> > >>>> > >>> >>> I looks like Simon has run >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2531 to ground to the extent >>> it looks like we are generating WSDL in accordance with the JAXB spec but >>> that several WSDL2Java tools are not able to cope with this. So for an >>> actual fix we are a bit stuck at the moment. He has suggested a work around >>> which involves adding JAXB annotations to Java classes to force a namespace >>> to appear. Dave, is this practical for you for the time being? >>> >>> As for the Geronimo issue (http://markmail.org/message/xb4m72afvn5xg67e) >>> can someone comment if this is being worked on? From the mails it looks like >>> either a Geronimo problem or a spec problem. Either of these will take some >>> time to fix. Do people think we can hold this over and do a 1.3.2? We have >>> been waiting a while to get 1.3.1 out and nobody has actually asked for the >>> Geronimo fix. >>> >>> Simon >> >> If Dave can live with the TUSCANY-2531 work around for now then I agree we >> should get 1.3.1 out and leave any other issues for the next release. Note >> for that to happen we still need another PMC +1 vote on 1.3.1, any other >> PMCers care to vote pending Dave's reply? >> >> ...ant >> >
-- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
