On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:11 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:35 PM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dave, >>>>> >>>>> Can any of your tests be contributed to Tuscany functional test suite >>>>> so that it can be run on a regular basis? >>>>> >>>>> Haleh >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey Simon, >>>>>> >>>>>> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository >>>>>> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously >>>>>> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws < >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby < >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Hey guys, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only >>>>>> be >>>>>> >> present in RC1? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Dave. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> -- >>>>>> >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws < >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for >>>>>> 1.3.2 up >>>>>> >> > here >>>>>> >> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>). >>>>>> No maven artifacts >>>>>> >> > yet. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It >>>>>> looks >>>>>> >> > like a >>>>>> >> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're >>>>>> going to >>>>>> >> > have >>>>>> >> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look >>>>>> at >>>>>> >> > this >>>>>> >> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Thanks >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Simon >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi Dave >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Simon >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I've put some maven artifacts up for 1.3.2 RC0 for people to look at. >>>> There still seems to be something strange about TUSCANY-2531 so it'll take >>>> a >>>> little time to run that to ground. >>>> >>>> Simon >>>> >>> >>> Ok, so I think we are pretty much don't with the issues that came out of >>> RC0. I'm fixing up a license issues then I'll post an RC1 and start a vote. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Simon >>> >> >> I'm currently copying up the 1.3.2RC1 artifacts to >> >> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC1/> >> >> Will be a few minutes until they are all there. Can people take a look and >> satisfy themselves that it works as expected. I've fixed the license header >> in sca.tld to be OSOA but ant has pointed out that there are others in >> tuscany-sca-api that are ASL2. I'm happy to fix them but I only want to do >> it once so can people comment on the active thread [1] either for or >> otherwise. >> >> Simon >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg02683.html >> > > I get "Forbidden" when i try to access the artifacts, could you twiddle the > permissions? > > ...ant > Just done it. Simon
