On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> I was under the impression that sca.tld [1] was comming from SCA >> specification. In this case, should it have the Apache License header >> on it ? >> >> [1] >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/modules/host-webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/sca.tld >> >> > AIUI it is ok and appropriate to have this using the Apache license. Its a > similar case to as when we have the spec defined Java interfaces, eg [1] or > [2]. > > IANAL... > > ...ant > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1/modules/sca-api/src/main/java/org/osoa/sca/CallableReference.java > [2] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/src/main/java/javax/annotation/Generated.java > > > > Hi I would like to understand the reasoning here. I think the Geronimo case (of implementing JSRs) is distinct from the case we have here of implementing sca.tld from the OSOA JEE spec due to [1] Simon [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jspa-position.html
