I've not read the OSOA HTTP binding spec, but I do have some Tuscany
experience with the HTTP and Atom bindings. I am especially interested
in their support for caching and conditional commands.
I gladly would like to help out on this one.
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I briefly read the draft. My impression is that it tries to come up some
sort of poor-man's Web Service support over HTTP using RPC style (tunneling
the invocations over HTTP). What are the advantages over SOAP/HTTP or
JSONRPC/HTTP? I'm wondering if it would be better to focus on the REST style
by mapping HTTP methods into a set of business operations that deal with
resources.
Thanks,
Raymond
From: ant elder
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:50 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Draft OASIS spec for binding.http
A draft spec for an HTTP binding has been posted to the OASIS bindings
mailing list -
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00078.html
It has some interesting things such as using the new wireFormat element and
the suggestion that you could extend that for atom and json support. I'm
interested in doing an implementation of this spec, anyone interested in
helping?
...ant
I think this will fall into the different strokes for different folks
category. If OASIS pick this up then people will want to use this binding so
we should look at it. We can then probably give OASIS some good feedback on
how to improve the spec. In the PHP SCA implementation we had a similar
"REST" binding and people quite liked it. Don't have an opinion on basing
the Web2.0 bindings on it.
Simon
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
