The OASIS bindings TC has now agreed to work on a binding.http specification, and an initial spec draft is available, see: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200811/msg00054.html
...ant On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just an FYI on whats happening with this is OASIS - the decision to accept > it into the Bindings TC was postponed for a week - see > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00094.html > > ...ant > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:00 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Excellent, thanks Dan. >> >> ...ant >> >> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> I've not read the OSOA HTTP binding spec, but I do have some Tuscany >>> experience with the HTTP and Atom bindings. I am especially interested in >>> their support for caching and conditional commands. >>> >>> I gladly would like to help out on this one. >>> >>> >>> Simon Laws wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I briefly read the draft. My impression is that it tries to come up >>>>> some >>>>> sort of poor-man's Web Service support over HTTP using RPC style >>>>> (tunneling >>>>> the invocations over HTTP). What are the advantages over SOAP/HTTP or >>>>> JSONRPC/HTTP? I'm wondering if it would be better to focus on the REST >>>>> style >>>>> by mapping HTTP methods into a set of business operations that deal >>>>> with >>>>> resources. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Raymond >>>>> >>>>> From: ant elder >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:50 AM >>>>> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Draft OASIS spec for binding.http >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A draft spec for an HTTP binding has been posted to the OASIS bindings >>>>> mailing list - >>>>> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00078.html >>>>> >>>>> It has some interesting things such as using the new wireFormat element >>>>> and >>>>> the suggestion that you could extend that for atom and json support. >>>>> I'm >>>>> interested in doing an implementation of this spec, anyone interested >>>>> in >>>>> helping? >>>>> >>>>> ...ant >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I think this will fall into the different strokes for different folks >>>> category. If OASIS pick this up then people will want to use this >>>> binding so >>>> we should look at it. We can then probably give OASIS some good feedback >>>> on >>>> how to improve the spec. In the PHP SCA implementation we had a similar >>>> "REST" binding and people quite liked it. Don't have an opinion on >>>> basing >>>> the Web2.0 bindings on it. >>>> >>>> Simon >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, Dan Becker >>> >> >> >
