Hi Ram

Some more comments in line.

Simon

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x
> >
> > Noticed that the following modules/projects (as shown below) are not been
> > included OR commented in the parent .pom file in the trunk.
> >
> > sca/java/demos:
> > load-balancing-webapp
>
Not part of build as I couldn't work out how to deploy Apache HTTPD
automatically.


>
> > workpool-distributed
>
Giorgio was working on this and I don't think it's finished


>
> >
> > sca/java/itest:
> > admin
>
very old. don't know what it does

>
> > binding-sca-jms
> > contribution-classloader
> > domain
>
old and needs to be removed


>
> > interop-soap-client
> > interop-soap-round2-client
> > interop-soap-service
>
> The interop-soap ones are not working, from the last time I checked
>
> > osgi-tuscany
>
This is the original test for tuscany running in an OSGI framework. We
haven't included this in the main build


>
> > promotion-interface-mismatch
> >
> > sca/java/samples:
> > calculator2
> > calculator-osgi
> > calculator-rcp
>
> I'd say that the osgi and rcp are more suitable for the 2,x branch
>
> > callbacks-jms
> > chat2-webapp
> > domain-management
> > domain-webapp
>
Old and should be removed


>
> > helloworld-bpel-ws
> This bpel should be working, not sure why it's out of the build
>
> > helloworld-distributed
> > helloworld-jsp
> > helloworld-servlet
> > helloworld-web
> > helloworld-web-callback
> > helloworld-ws-deep-webapp
> > helloworld-ws-service-webapp
> > spi-implementation-pojo
> >
> > I understand that we have few projects/modules, which does not get
> included
> > as part of the distribution for a valid reason.
> >
> > But could not understand the reason behind, not including the above
> > mentioned projects as active in the trunk. Can some one help me
> understand?
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I have commented some above. I also think that couple others are still
> experimental, but I'll leave for others to comment.
>
> A good strategy would be to double check with the previous release
> branch/binary distribution and see if these are old modules that have
> not been released, or if they are new and might be experimental for
> now.
>
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to