That sounds like a good approach. ...ant
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Ram > > I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the > distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution > files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the > release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable > modules and make everybody happy :) > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the > 1.4 > >> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need > to > >> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in > the > >> 2.x trunk. > >> > >> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms > as > >> well > >> > >> ...ant > >> > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > You are right, I proposed to remove them from > > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/). > > > > > > Hi Ant, > > > > The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be to > > included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this could > be > > removed. > > > > Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take care > of > > this. > > > > For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of the > > distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty long > > time. > > Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty old > and > > not used? > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Ramkumar Ramalingam > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >