That sounds like a good approach.

   ...ant

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Ram
>
>   I think you can leave them in 1.x trunk, and play with the
> distribution assemblies to remove from the generated distribution
> files. This would allow you to continue working in 1.x for the
> release, and also have a clean distribution with the working/stable
> modules and make everybody happy :)
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:39 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Which i don't think we should be doing. Fine to remove things from the
> 1.4
> >> release branch (yes i know that doesn't exist yet) but there's no need
> to
> >> delete things from 1.x is there? We're doing that type of clean up in
> the
> >> 2.x trunk.
> >>
> >> The sample/callbacks-jms could be included in 1.4, and binding-sca-jms
> as
> >> well
> >>
> >>    ...ant
> >>
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > You are right, I proposed to remove them from
> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/).
> >
> >
> > Hi Ant,
> >
> > The samples/callbacks-jms and itest/binding-sca-jms does not seem be to
> > included in samples/pom.xml and itest/pom.xml, hence thought this could
> be
> > removed.
> >
> > Now since you wish to have them in 1.4, I can raise a JIRA to take care
> of
> > this.
> >
> > For other samples/itest listed for removal, seems to be not part of the
> > distribution for long time and also looks like not active for pretty long
> > time.
> > Not sure, why we need to have them in the trunk if they are pretty old
> and
> > not used?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Ramkumar Ramalingam
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to