On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I'm also leaning to have one single 1.x branch and release 1.4, 1.4.x, 1.5 > out of it. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:42 AM > To: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [SCA 1.4] Schedule, Features, Branching, etc > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey Dave >>>>> >>>>> With the results from [1], I guess we are ready to cut the 1.x >>>>> branch where any work necessary for a 1.4 release can be done. As for >>>>> the 1.4 release plans, we probably need to revise the plans and >>>>> schedule, but any help on getting the release out from others on the >>>>> community is certainly welcome. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/na5r3ghoji6nqlzw >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Luciano, >>>> >>>> I would be very much interested in getting involved with the release >>>> activities in getting the release done for 1.4. >>>> >>>> Please let me know, where to start and how to proceed further? Thanks. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks & Regards, >>>> Ramkumar Ramalingam >>>> >>> >>> Here's some things that need to happen: >>> >>> Firstly make the release branch from trunk/1.x >>> - create the 1.4 branch by doing an svn copy from 1.x to 1.4 >>> - rename the version in the trunk/1.x to be 1.5-SNAPSHOT >>> >>> >> Do we really need to create a 1.4 branch ? I thought that we could do >> most of the stabilization work in trunk and avoid merging back and >> forth. >> >> Complete build of 1.4 including distribution >>> >>> Start reviewing and testing the 1.4 distribution >>> - legal: >>> --compare the jars in the lib folder to whats in the 1.3.2 release lib >>> folder and note differences >>> --compare the LICENSE and NOTICE with whats in 1.3.2 distribution and >>> note >>> the differences >>> - try out all the samples, demos and tutorials checking they still work >>> as >>> described in the READMEs raising JIRAs for any problems >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > > So I see Ram has been fixing loads of issues with 1.x and testing the the samples. What's the state of play? Are we ready to create a release candidate and get people to try it? What's left to do? Regards Simon
