Hi Simon, Yes, I think we are in a good shape to create a release candidate and get people to try it out.
Can I can go ahead and create a release candidate now, as I was waiting for the confirmation on modules that needs to be included/excluded for distribution. Not sure if we can deal with the inclusion/exclusion of modules after we create a release candidation. Please suggest. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm also leaning to have one single 1.x branch and release 1.4, 1.4.x, 1.5 >> out of it. >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:42 AM >> To: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [SCA 1.4] Schedule, Features, Branching, etc >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Luciano Resende < >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey Dave >>>>>> >>>>>> With the results from [1], I guess we are ready to cut the 1.x >>>>>> branch where any work necessary for a 1.4 release can be done. As for >>>>>> the 1.4 release plans, we probably need to revise the plans and >>>>>> schedule, but any help on getting the release out from others on the >>>>>> community is certainly welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/na5r3ghoji6nqlzw >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Luciano, >>>>> >>>>> I would be very much interested in getting involved with the release >>>>> activities in getting the release done for 1.4. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know, where to start and how to proceed further? Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks & Regards, >>>>> Ramkumar Ramalingam >>>>> >>>> >>>> Here's some things that need to happen: >>>> >>>> Firstly make the release branch from trunk/1.x >>>> - create the 1.4 branch by doing an svn copy from 1.x to 1.4 >>>> - rename the version in the trunk/1.x to be 1.5-SNAPSHOT >>>> >>>> >>> Do we really need to create a 1.4 branch ? I thought that we could do >>> most of the stabilization work in trunk and avoid merging back and >>> forth. >>> >>> Complete build of 1.4 including distribution >>>> >>>> Start reviewing and testing the 1.4 distribution >>>> - legal: >>>> --compare the jars in the lib folder to whats in the 1.3.2 release lib >>>> folder and note differences >>>> --compare the LICENSE and NOTICE with whats in 1.3.2 distribution and >>>> note >>>> the differences >>>> - try out all the samples, demos and tutorials checking they still work >>>> as >>>> described in the READMEs raising JIRAs for any problems >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Luciano Resende >>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> > So I see Ram has been fixing loads of issues with 1.x and testing the the > samples. What's the state of play? Are we ready to create a release > candidate and get people to try it? What's left to do? > > Regards > > Simon > -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
