I'm a little worried that we would try to attack multiple issues and don't give the necessary attention to the core in this first milestone release. I was considering ws binding already somewhat a stretch, and maybe we should even revisit that. I think another option would be to get milestones releases much more frequent then usual, and agree on a roadmap where we would incrementally address these other areas ?
BTW, for a release time frame idea, I was thinking on starting preparing this release very early in January. Thoughts ? On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 to have a milestone release for 2.0 (such as 2.0M1) in January. I >>> envision the following features to be supported: >>> >>> 1) OSGi-enabled core >>> 2) implementation.java >>> 3) binding.ws >>> 4) A simple/consitent SCA domain story >>> 5) samples and itests working with both JSE and Equinox >>> >> >> I'd like to include the webapp runtime here as well. >> >> ...ant >> >> > I think we should look at webapp now also. It's been an awkward bedfellow of > the domain for a while and I'd like to know how we think that it should > work. It maybe that we don't think simple webapps should take part in the > domain but it would be good to air the issue. > > Simon > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
