On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > More comments inline. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > *From:* Simon Laws <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:41 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [2.0] Align samples with the distributions > > >>> >> Agreed. It's just a local repo. Do you think adding a little structure add >> technical difficulty or is a flat structure a personal preference? I'm >> interested in situations like this where we have some people who want >> solution A and others want solution B (where both solutions are valid). How >> do we come to a conclusion? In the past this has tended to stall us a little >> so this is a good chance to see if we can do better;-) >> >> I'm seeing some technical issues: >> >> 1) Adding a little structure will make the distribution incompatible with >> Equinox OSGi launcher and PDE target platform. >> > > I believe this is a statement about how it works just now rather than a > statement about blockers for change. > > I more view it as a block for introducing structural changes. The current > layout can be directly used as an Equinox installation of bundles or PDE > target location. > That seems like FUD to me, I don't see any reason it can't be made to work with either structure. This seems to be the main objection so if we can show it can work then can we lay this debate to rest? ...ant
