I'm trying to catch up on this thread, could someone summarize what's the current status and open items ?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:36 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> More comments inline. >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> From: Simon Laws >> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:41 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [2.0] Align samples with the distributions >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Agreed. It's just a local repo. Do you think adding a little structure >>> add technical difficulty or is a flat structure a personal preference? I'm >>> interested in situations like this where we have some people who want >>> solution A and others want solution B (where both solutions are valid). How >>> do we come to a conclusion? In the past this has tended to stall us a little >>> so this is a good chance to see if we can do better;-) >>> >>> I'm seeing some technical issues: >>> >>> 1) Adding a little structure will make the distribution incompatible with >>> Equinox OSGi launcher and PDE target platform. >> >> I believe this is a statement about how it works just now rather than a >> statement about blockers for change. >> >> I more view it as a block for introducing structural changes. The current >> layout can be directly used as an Equinox installation of bundles or PDE >> target location. > > That seems like FUD to me, I don't see any reason it can't be made to work > with either structure. This seems to be the main objection so if we can show > it can work then can we lay this debate to rest? > > ...ant > > > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
