One more question:

The "maven-plugins" is now at top level instead of "java" and it has its own 
trunk/tags/branches. This is not consistent with what we have for the 
sdo/das/sca structure. At this moment, the java implementations of sdo/das/sca 
are all under "java" (trunk) and the tags/branches have separate folders for 
the subprojects. Should we stick with that? If so, the structure will be:

tuscany/java/maven-plugins/maven-eclipse-compiler (I think the maven-plugins 
are for java too)
tuscany/branches/maven-plugins/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0 
tuscany/tags/maven-plugins/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0

Thanks,
Raymond

From: ant elder 
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 10:46 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: Releasing the Tuscany Maven Eclipse compiler module





On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote:

  I like the overall direction to release it separately. Do you plan to use it 
for our 2.0_M1 release?

Probably a bit late for M1 unless that turns out having lots and lots of RCs 
which doesnt seem very likely. Even starting a vote tomorrow this plugin 
wouldn't be out till Friday so and an M1 RC then which is a bit of a delay 
unless someone objects to M1 without this plugin release.




  I have a few comments:

  1) Should we rename "plugins" to "maven-plugins" to be clear that it contains 
maven plugins? 

ok
 

  2) Should we also consider the following renaming too?
  Maven groupId: org.apache.tuscany.plugins ==> org.apache.tuscany.maven.plugins
  Java package name: org.apache.tuscany.sca.tools.maven.compiler ==> 
org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler

Yes, completely forgot about the package renames.
 


  3) How about having the initial version as 2.0.0?

That one i'm not so sure about, its got no ties to the SCA 2.0 release and its 
never been released before so v1 seems ok to me, either would work though, what 
do others prefer?

 

  Later on, we can try to see if we can get other plugins into this base, such 
as the osgi-based surefire plugin, and the our enhanced bundle plugin.


+1, i think we can move out most of the things in the tools folder (other than 
the eclipse plugin) to be released separately from the SCA project (I'd 
actually like to consider releasing the sca-api module like this too so people 
can have applications not tied to Tuscany SCA releases but i guess thats for 
another thread).



   ...ant

Reply via email to