On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> One more question: > > The "maven-plugins" is now at top level instead of "java" and it has its > own trunk/tags/branches. This is not consistent with what we have for the > sdo/das/sca structure. At this moment, the java implementations of > sdo/das/sca are all under "java" (trunk) and the tags/branches have separate > folders for the subprojects. Should we stick with that? If so, the structure > will be: > > tuscany/java/maven-plugins/maven-eclipse-compiler (I think the > maven-plugins are for java too) > tuscany/branches/maven-plugins/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0 > tuscany/tags/maven-plugins/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0 > Actually even that isn't quite consistent with how the tags and branches are used today - it would be tuscany/branches/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0 and tuscany/tags/java/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0. However, AFICT the current structure of tuscany/java, tuscany/branches, and tuscany/tags was, well, a mistake, done before we understood the normal conventions. So as this was new i picked the way which seemed more consistent with how most other projects do this. If you feel strongly about this though i really don't mind, to communicate that how about voting over on the vote thread with a conditional vote? ...ant
