On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Ramkumar R <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > Things looks pretty good with RC3 with couple of minor corrections > required... > > - Missing RELEASE_NOTES and CHANGES file in the tag
I think you meant the release folder. I have fixed, although I didn't think this was a requirement . > - Should all the samples in the binary distribution need to have > pre-compiled jar files in target folder? > - Not sure about this... Should we have "etc" folder in the source > distribution? > > I believe during 1.4 release, we agreed that the modules names in Tuscany > would follow the below standard.... > > Samples: Apache Tuscany SCA Sample <modulename> > iTests: Apache Tuscany SCA iTest <modulename> > Demos: Apache Tuscany SCA Demo <modulename> > > I will raise a JIRA to fix the module name issue. > > I believe these are all very minor issues, and not really something that would hold the release. > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for >> Java. >> >> The artifacts are available for review at: >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC3/ >> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, >> and the Maven staging repository. >> >> The release tag is available at : >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1-RC3/ >> >> >> Looks OK to me, here is my +1. >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Ramkumar Ramalingam > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
