On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:59 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> I think it is. But maybe what we could do is run though the tests, >>> legal etc in 1.x before cutting the branch to give a day or so more >>> for responses. I intend to give the samples a runt through as soon as >>> I can get done with some 2.x things I'm working on. >>> >>> Simon >>> >> >> Ok good, we're starting to run out of time to get this out this month >> so unless anyone objects i'll cut a release branch tomorrow. If you >> must commit to 1.x before this is done then please be a little >> careful, verify relevant samples and test, and run a full build etc. >> >> ...ant >> > > Done in r775437 we have a new 1.5 release branch - > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5/ .Thats > building cleanly for me though there do still exist a couple of > intermittent failures. To help with getting 1.5 out smoothly how about > no code changes other than sample and test fixes without first > discussing on the ML? I'll try to get an RC1 out by first thing next > week. > > ...ant >
Thanks Ant. I'm guessing a bit but this exception funny seems to be something to do with whether pass by value handling is included or not. The remote exception test fails when the returned exception is physically the same instance as the original exception that was thrown. Suggests that it's not being copied as it should be on some runs. I'm sure we've seen this before recently but don't remember the exact cause. Anyhow that's as far as I've got. Simon
