ant elder wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
I think it is. But maybe what we could do is run though the tests,
legal etc in 1.x before cutting the branch to give a day or so more
for responses. I intend to give the samples a runt through as soon as
I can get done with some 2.x things I'm working on.
Simon
Ok good, we're starting to run out of time to get this out this month
so unless anyone objects i'll cut a release branch tomorrow. If you
must commit to 1.x before this is done then please be a little
careful, verify relevant samples and test, and run a full build etc.
...ant
Done in r775437 we have a new 1.5 release branch -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.5/ .Thats
building cleanly for me though there do still exist a couple of
intermittent failures. To help with getting 1.5 out smoothly how about
no code changes other than sample and test fixes without first
discussing on the ML? I'll try to get an RC1 out by first thing next
week.
...ant
I tried building this and I am getting the same failure in
itest/contribution-jee.
Simon
Could you paste in the error here?
...ant
Here it is.
Simon
>> (cut)
That looks like the openejb problem in TUSCANY-2935. To avoid it I've
now taken the contribution-jee itest out of the build in the 1.5
branch (r775583) .
...ant
Thanks. I am getting a bit further now. The next failure is in
itest/exceptions which looks like the problem that others have reported.
Simon
