One question on this while thinking about the rest of the email... On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Simon Laws<[email protected]> wrote:
> The spec says "If the callback element is not present, the behaviour > is runtime implementation dependent.". We could assume that the > callback binding is the same as the forward binding if it's not > specified. This is tricky though as you don't know what the callback > binding is until you have matched the forward wire. We do this late in > the day now and the callback would always end up with and SCA binding. > . this will work ok when using binding.sca though right? If so then it doesn't seem such a big deal to me if only (3) is supported when using other bindings. ...ant
