On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, ant elder<[email protected]> wrote: > One question on this while thinking about the rest of the email... > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Simon Laws<[email protected]> wrote: > >> The spec says "If the callback element is not present, the behaviour >> is runtime implementation dependent.". We could assume that the >> callback binding is the same as the forward binding if it's not >> specified. This is tricky though as you don't know what the callback >> binding is until you have matched the forward wire. We do this late in >> the day now and the callback would always end up with and SCA binding. >> . > > this will work ok when using binding.sca though right? If so then it > doesn't seem such a big deal to me if only (3) is supported when using > other bindings. > > ...ant >
Right, it's the same information passing across the wire. Hence I've gone for passing the callback Endpoint URI. Simon
