Sure and like i said i don't think there's any policy about it so there's no urgent need to change anything yet, its just an fyi.
...ant On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > It is a workaround to use svn as the maven repo to host some dependencies > that are not in the central maven repo. I would like to keep it before we > can push all the dependencies into the central maven repo. As Luciano > pointed out, getting third party jars into maven central repo is really > painful and we cannot afford the "wait" in such cases. > > I thought svn is more reliable than the people.apache.org. The Axis2 folks > have ws zone. Can we get one :-)? > > Thanks, > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "ant elder" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:11 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure > >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> We also should look at not requiring the maven repo folder we have in >>>> SVN as these are being actively discouraged now. >>>> >>> >>> How would we go about publishing dependencies that are not available >>> in a public maven repo ? Should we use p.a.o instead of svn ? I >>> believe Raymond and I have tried the maven central in the past without >>> much luck. >>> >> >> AIUI the feeling within the ASF and Maven project is that repositories >> in the ASF SVN are a "terrible idea". No offical policy yet that I've >> seen but other projects that had them are getting rid of them, eg >> Geronimo - http://apache.markmail.org/message/l2xztcnnpgioxqww >> >> ...ant > >
