On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:50 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:05 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Next, >>>> I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework. >>>> >>> >>> How about updating to Jackson instead of Jabsorb? We already use >>> Jackson in the JSONP binding in 2.x, it seems much more up to date and >>> designed for what we need in Tuscany. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> I had a quick look at jackson, does that have support for JSON-RPC or >> just JSON ? >> >> > > Right, it handles just the JSON part, we'd have to layer the rest of > the protocol on top of that. Not such a big deal though and a similar > thing as we already do in the binding for the SMD support. > > ...ant >
Reading a thread in jackson-user [1] it seems that it has JAXB dependencies ... do you know if that is true ? If so, I'd like to avoid it as it would prevent the extensions to run on AppEngine. [1] http://markmail.org/message/lg3t6z3frw4ijl32 -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
