The JAXB feature seems to be in a separate jar: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/jackson/jackson-xc/1.2.1/

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luciano Resende" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:44 AM
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Using Jackson for JSON-RPC, was Re: [2.x] JSON-RPC Binding Availability

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:50 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:05 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote:

 Next,
I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework.


How about updating to Jackson instead of Jabsorb? We already use
Jackson in the JSONP binding in 2.x, it seems much more up to date and
designed for what we need in Tuscany.

  ...ant


I had a quick look at jackson, does that have support for JSON-RPC or
just JSON ?



Right, it handles just the JSON part, we'd have to layer the rest of
the protocol on top of that. Not such a big deal though and a similar
thing as we already do in the binding for the SMD support.

  ...ant


Reading a thread in jackson-user [1] it seems that it has JAXB
dependencies ... do you know if that is true ? If so, I'd like to
avoid it as it would prevent the extensions to run on AppEngine.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/lg3t6z3frw4ijl32

--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to